Grønlandsudvalget 2016-17
GRU Alm.del Bilag 22
Offentligt
1706963_0001.png
Global Agenda Council on the Arctic
Arctic Investment Protocol
Guidelines for Responsible
Investment in the Arctic
December 2015
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0002.png
Arctic Investment Protocol
The Arctic is a diverse, rapidly-changing and
environmentally sensitive region that is home for its four
million residents and also an emerging global investment
opportunity. To balance these dimensions, the Investment
Protocol of the World Economic Forum Global Agenda
Council on the Arctic aspires to promote sustainable and
equitable economic growth in the region that furthers
community well-being and builds resilient societies in a
fair, inclusive and environmentally sound manner. The
following principles lay the foundation for responsible Arctic
development:
1. Build resilient societies through economic
development
Take a long-term investment view
Promote long-term sustainability and economic
diversification of projects and communities
Create job opportunities and skills for residents, develop
human capital that can serve to develop and diversify
regional economies
Promote development of civil societies through
economic growth
Openly discuss active partnerships with Arctic
communities through investment opportunities
2. Respect and include local communities and
indigenous peoples
Respect the rights of indigenous and local people and
mitigate any adverse impact on their traditional
practices
Consult with local authorities, indigenous governance
structures and relevant community authorities
Before undertaking any activity that might adversely
affect the traditional practices and livelihood of local
communities and indigenous peoples, develop a
consultation process that seeks agreement and
complies with domestic laws
Promote capacity-building in local communities and
with indigenous peoples in order to enable active
participation in processes concerning the land, territories
or resources
3. Pursue measures to protect the environment of the
Arctic
Review the feasibility of investment opportunities by
balancing economic benefits with environmental and
climate goals, incorporating environmental and social
concerns into investment analysis
Recognize the close linkages between the biophysical
environment and society in the Arctic, and approach
impact analysis in a holistic manner. Responsibly
engage local communities in pursuit of measures to
protect the Arctic environment with an ecosystem-based
management approach where such an approach is
required by national and international law 
Pursue technically and financially feasible measures
that minimize the potential for adverse impact on the
environment and health
Where project impact is unknown or difficult to assess,
investors and developers should take measures
to manage project impact by implementing strong
mitigation procedures and following a scientific and
knowledge-based approach
4. Practice responsible and transparent business
methods
Conduct all business in a fair, legal and transparent
manner; actively fight corruption
Evaluate, report as required and address impacts on, as
well as benefits for, communities and the environment at
all stages
Encourage the development of a grievance process for
local communities, indigenous peoples and other Arctic
stakeholders, in compliance with domestic laws
5. Consult and integrate science and traditional
ecological knowledge
Pursue rigorous scientific research working towards
understanding the impact of investment projects and of
the broader effects of commercial activity in the Arctic
Develop an overall foundation for investment
that integrates rigorous science with traditional/
local ecological knowledge to ensure adequate
environmental, social and economic impact assessment
Adhere to accepted research norms for baseline data
and impact monitoring in conjunction with investment
World Economic Forum ®
© 2015 – All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or
transmitted in any form or by any means, including
photocopying and recording, or by any information
storage and retrieval system.
REF 161115
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0003.png
6. Strengthen pan-Arctic
collaboration and sharing of best
practices
Encourage public-private
partnerships and collaboration
where appropriate
Recognize that the Arctic is a
diverse and distinct environment
with large geographical,
demographic, seasonal and
climatic variations that will
determine the optimal regulatory
framework and approaches across
regions and situations
Promote cross-border dialogue
to adopt common standards
and best practices to maximize
the environmental, social and
financial benefits of development in
accordance with relevant national
and international laws.
As members of the global community
wishing that development in the Arctic
is responsible and sustainable, we
encourage citizens and organizations
around the world to support the
six broad principles of the Arctic
Investment Protocol.
International guidelines have been
consulted to inform the drafting of
the Arctic Investment Protocol. See
the Appendix for a full list of the
organizations consulted.
Guidelines for Responsible Investment in the Arctic
3
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0004.png
Appendix
Aspen Principles for Long-Term Value Creation
-
Explicitly written as aspirational guidelines for good
business practice. In subscribing, and moving over time
to implement these outcome-oriented principles in their
own organizations, operating companies and investors are
leading by example and taking a stand that a long-term
focus is critical to long-term value creation.
http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/
images/Aspen_Principles_with_signers_June_10_0.pdf
The Aspen Institute (2007), Long-Term Value Creation:
Guiding Principles For Corporations and Investors.
Aspen Principles of Arctic Governance
The Principles
form the foundation and the standards by which future
governance and sustainable management of human
activities in the Arctic should be measured. The principles
are:
1. Optimize ecosystem resilience, integrity and productivity
by maintaining food-web (trophic) structure and
protecting and restoring biodiversity and available
habitat.
2. Maintain the full suite of Arctic ecosystem services to
support human well-being on a continuing basis.
3. Promote investment in scientific research and related
infrastructure necessary to ensure sustainable
development and environmental protection.
4. Avoid exacerbating changes that may be difficult or
impossible to reverse in temperature, sea-ice extent,
pH, and other key physical, chemical and biological
ecosystem parameters.
5. Assess, monitor and manage multiple human activities
using an integrated, adaptive, ecosystem-based
management system that takes into account risks and
cumulative and interacting effects.
6. Apply ecosystem management processes based on
science and traditional knowledge. New and expanded
human activities are subject to prior assessment.
Prudent measures to reduce or eliminate impacts are
to be taken when there are reasonable grounds for
concern that such activities will, directly or indirectly,
bring about hazards to human health, harm living
resources and ecosystems, damage amenities or
interfere with other legitimate uses.
7. Fully respect the rights, including human rights, of Arctic
residents and Arctic indigenous peoples, and maximize
participation in and transparency of decision-making for
all interested stakeholders.
8. Link global policy discussions to the need to conserve
and manage Arctic ecosystems and dependent
communities.
9. Promote cooperation among Arctic States to arrive at
appropriate standards for managing activities in the
Arctic to meet the special conditions of the Arctic region,
while promoting sustainable development.
10. Inform, in a timely manner, national and international
decision-makers as well as the public of the
consequences of climate change impacts in the Arctic,
and needed actions required to meet the above noted
principles.
4
Arctic Investment Protocol
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4257743/Aspen-
Climate-Change-Report-v22lr%20%283.29.11%29.pdf
The Aspen Institute (2011), The Shared Future: A Report of
the Aspen Institute Commission On Arctic Climate Change
Equator Principles
- The Equator Principles is a risk
management framework, adopted by financial institutions,
for determining, assessing and managing environmental
and social risk in projects and is primarily intended to
provide a minimum standard for due diligence to support
responsible risk decision-making. The Equator Principles
apply globally, to all industry sectors and to four financial
products 1) Project Finance Advisory Services 2) Project
Finance 3) Project-Related Corporate Loans and 4) Bridge
Loans.
http://www.equator-principles.com/resources/equator_
principles_III.pdf
The Equator Principles Association (2011), The Equator
Principles
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
-
The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)
is a global Standard to promote open and accountable
management of natural resources.  It seeks to strengthen
government and company systems, inform public debate,
and enhance trust.  In each implementing country it is
supported by a coalition of governments, companies and
civil society working together. Natural resources, such as
oil, gas, metals and minerals, belong to a country’s citizens.
Extraction of these resources can lead to economic
growth and social development. However, when poorly
managed it has too often lead to corruption and even
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0005.png
conflict. More openness around how a country manages its
natural resource wealth is necessary to ensure that these
resources can benefit all citizens. The EITI Principles are:
1. We share a belief that the prudent use of natural
resource wealth should be an important engine for
sustainable economic growth that contributes to
sustainable development and poverty reduction, but if
not managed properly, can create negative economic
and social impacts.
2. We affirm that management of natural resource wealth
for the benefit of a country’s citizens is in the domain of
sovereign governments to be exercised in the interests
of their national development.
3. We recognise that the benefits of resource extraction
occur as revenue streams over many years and can be
highly price dependent.
4. We recognise that a public understanding of government
revenues and expenditure over time could help public
debate and inform choice of appropriate and realistic
options for sustainable development.
5. We underline the importance of transparency by
governments and companies in the extractive
industries and the need to enhance public financial
management and accountability.
6. We recognise that achievement of greater transparency
must be set in the context of respect for contracts and
laws.
7. We recognise the enhanced environment for domestic
and foreign direct investment that financial transparency
may bring.
8. We believe in the principle and practice of accountability
by government to all citizens for the stewardship of
revenue streams and public expenditure.
9. We are committed to encouraging high standards
of transparency and accountability in public life,
government operations and in business,
10. We believe that a broadly consistent and workable
approach to the disclosure of payments and revenues is
required, which is simple to undertake and to use.
11. We believe that payments’ disclosure in a given country
should involve all extractive industry companies
operating in that country.
12. In seeking solutions, we believe that all stakeholders
have important and relevant contributions to make –
including governments and their agencies, extractive
industry companies, service companies, multilateral
organisations, financial organisations, investors, and
non-governmental organisations.
https://eiti.org/eiti/principles
Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (2003),
The EITI Principles
International Council on Mining & Metals Indigenous
Peoples and Mining Position Statement
-
This
position statement sets out ICMM members’ approach to
engaging with Indigenous Peoples and to free, prior and
informed consent (FPIC) ICMM’s vision is for constructive
relationships between mining and metals companies and
Indigenous Peoples that are based on mutual respect,
meaningful engagement, trust and mutual benefit.
Recognizing the potential vulnerability of Indigenous
Peoples, the commitments in this position statement may
be summarized as requiring members to: respect the
rights, interests, special connections to lands and waters,
and perspectives of Indigenous Peoples, where mining
projects are to be located on lands traditionally owned by
or under customary use of Indigenous Peoples; adopt and
apply engagement and consultation processes that ensure
the meaningful participation of indigenous communities in
decision making, through a process that is consistent with
their traditional decision-making processes and is based
on good faith negotiation; work to obtain the consent
of Indigenous Peoples where required by this position
statement.
https://www.icmm.com/document/5433
International Council on Mining and Metals (2013),
Indigenous Peoples and Mining Position Statement
International Maritime Organization (IMO)
-
As a
specialized agency of the United Nations, IMO is the
global standard-setting authority for the safety, security
and environmental performance of international shipping.
Its main role is to create a regulatory framework for the
shipping industry that is fair and effective, universally
adopted and universally implemented.
http://www.imo.org/en/About/Pages/Default.aspx
International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance
Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability
-
The Performance Standards provide guidance on how
to identify risks and impacts, and are designed to help
avoid, mitigate, and manage risks and impacts as a way of
doing business in a sustainable way, including stakeholder
engagement and disclosure obligations. The Performance
Standards are:
Performance Standard 1: Assessment and Management
of Environmental and Social Risks and Impacts
Performance Standard 2: Labor and Working Conditions
Performance Standard 3: Resource Efficiency and
Pollution Prevention
Performance Standard 4: Community Health, Safety,
and Security
Performance Standard 5: Land Acquisition and
Involuntary Resettlement
Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and
Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources
Performance Standard 7: Indigenous Peoples
Performance Standard 8: Cultural Heritage
Guidelines for Responsible Investment in the Arctic
5
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0006.png
http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/115482804a025
5db96fbffd1a5d13d27/PS_English_2012_Full-Document.
pdf?MOD=AJPERES
International Finance Corporation (2012), Performance
Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability
National Science Foundation (U.S.) Principles for the
Conduct of Research in the Arctic
-
The principles are
formulated to provide guidance for researchers in the
physical, biological, behavioral, health, economic, political,
and social sciences and in the humanities. These principles
are to be observed when carrying out or sponsoring
research in Arctic and northern regions or when applying
the results of this research. The principles address the need
to promote mutual respect and communication between
scientists and northern residents. Cooperation is needed
at all stages of research planning and implementation in
projects that directly affect northern people. Cooperation
will contribute to a better understanding of the potential
benefits of Arctic research for northern residents and will
contribute to the development of northern science through
traditional knowledge and experience.
http://www.nsf.gov/geo/plr/arctic/conduct.jsp
National Science Foundation, Principles for the Conduct of
Research in the Arctic
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
(MNEs) are a set of recommendations on responsible
business conduct addressed by governments to
MNEs operating in or from adhering countries. They
are supported by representatives of business, worker
organisations and non-governmental organisations. They
are most comprehensive set of government-backed
recommendations on responsible business conduct
in existence today. The governments adhering to the
Guidelines aim to encourage and maximize the positive
impact MNEs can make to sustainable development and
enduring social progress. They provide voluntary principles
and standards for responsible business conduct in areas
such as employment and industrial relations, human rights,
environment, information disclosure, combating bribery,
consumer interests, science and technology, competition,
and taxation. The Guidelines were first adopted in 1976
and have been reviewed 5 times since then (the last time in
2011) to ensure that they remain a leading tool to promote
responsible business conduct in the changing landscape of
the global economy. The Guidelines were developed with
the active participation of business, labour, NGOs, non-
adhering countries and international organisations.
Adhering countries are obliged to set up National
Contact Points (NCPs) that are tasked with furthering the
effectiveness of the Guidelines by undertaking promotional
activities, handling inquiries, and providing a mediation and
conciliation platform for resolving issues that arise from the
alleged non-observance of the Guidelines. This makes the
Guidelines the only international corporate responsibility
instrument with a built-in grievance mechanism.
6
Arctic Investment Protocol
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0007.png
The Guidelines focus on two aspects of the business-
society relationship: 1) positive contribution MNEs can
make to sustainable development, and 2) avoiding adverse
impacts and addressing them when they do occur.
Addressing the two sides of the same coin in a holistic
manner is one of the most important contributions the
Guidelines make in the global field of responsible business
conduct.
http://mneguidelines.oecd.org/MNEguidelines_
RBCmatters.pdf
OECD Guidelines For Multinational Enterprises Responsible
Business Conduct Matters
UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
General Principles
These Guiding Principles are grounded in recognition of:
(b) The role of business enterprises as specialized organs
of society performing specialized functions, required to
comply with all applicable laws and to respect human
rights; and
(c) The need for rights and obligations to be matched to
appropriate and effective remedies when breached.
Foundational Principles
II. The corporate responsibility to respect human rights
Business enterprises should respect human rights. This
means that they should avoid infringing on the human
rights of others and should address adverse human rights
impacts with which they are involved.
III. Access to remedy
As part of their duty to protect against business-related
human rights abuse, States must take appropriate steps to
ensure, through judicial, administrative, legislative or other
appropriate means, that when such abuses occur within
their territory and/or jurisdiction those affected have access
to effective remedy.
http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/
GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf
United Nations (2011), Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights
UN Principles for Responsible Investment
-
The United
Nations-supported Principles for Responsible Investment
(PRI) Initiative is an international network of investors
working together to put the six Principles for Responsible
Investment into practice. Its goal is to understand the
implications of sustainability for investors and support
signatories to incorporate these issues into their investment
decision making and ownership practices. The six
principles are:
Principle 1: We will incorporate ESG issues into
investment analysis and decision-making processes.
Possible actions:
Address ESG issues in investment policy statements
Support development of ESG-related tools, metrics, and
analyses
Assess the capabilities of internal investment managers
to incorporate ESG issues
Assess the capabilities of external investment managers
to incorporate ESG issues
Ask investment service providers (such as financial
analysts, consultants, brokers, research firms, or rating
companies) to integrate ESG factors into evolving
research and analysis
Encourage academic and other research on this theme
Advocate ESG training for investment professionals
Principle 2: We will be active owners and incorporate
ESG issues into our ownership policies and practices.
Principle 3: We will seek appropriate disclosure on ESG
issues by the entities in which we invest.
Principle 4: We will promote acceptance and
implementation of the Principles within the investment
industry.
Principle 5: We will work together to enhance our
effectiveness in implementing the Principles.
Principle 6: We will each report on our activities and
progress towards implementing the Principles.
http://www.unpri.org/about-pri/the-six-principles/
Principles for Responsible Investment Association (2006),
The Six Principles.
World Bank Group Environmental, Health and Safety
Guidelines
-
The EHS Guidelines are technical reference
documents with general and industry-specific examples
of Good International Industry Practice (GIIP). IFC uses the
EHS Guidelines as a technical source of information during
project appraisal activities. The EHS Guidelines contain
the performance levels and measures that are normally
acceptable to IFC, and that are generally considered to be
achievable in new facilities at reasonable costs by existing
technology.
http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_
content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ifc+sustainability/
our+approach/risk+management/ehsguidelines
World Bank Group (2007), Environmental, Health and Safety
General Guidelines
Guidelines for Responsible Investment in the Arctic
7
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0008.png
Members of the Global Agenda Council
on the Arctic
Anders Blom,
Chairman, Protect Sápmi
Anne-Marie Brady,
Editor-in-Chief, The Polar Journal
Lawson Brigham,
Distinguished Professor of Geography
and Arctic Policy, University of Alaska Fairbanks
Heather Conley,
Senior Vice-President, Europe, Eurasia
and the Arctic, Center for Strategic and International
Studies
Michael Daly,
Visiting Professor of Earth Sciences,
University of Oxford
Neil Hamilton,
Managing Director, Quaternary Research Pty
Ltd
Rúni M. Hansen,
Vice-President, Statoil ASA
Susan Harper,
Director-General and Senior Arctic Official,
Government of Canada
Sturla Henriksen,
Chief Executive Officer, Norwegian
Shipowners’ Association
Yoko Kamikawa,
Member of the House of Representatives
of Japan
Andrei V. Kortunov,
President, New Eurasia Foundation
Scott Minerd,
Chief Investment Officer, Guggenheim
Partners LLC
Ann Pickard,
Executive Vice President, Upstream Americas
– Arctic, Shell Energy Resources Company
Theodore Roosevelt,
Managing Director and Chairman,
Cleantech Initiative, Barclays
Laurence C. Smith,
Professor and Chair, UCLA Department
of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles (Vice-
Chair)
Jonas Gahr Støre,
Leader, Norwegian Labour Party (Chair)
Cho Tae-Yul,
Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Korea
Mead Treadwell,
President, Pt Capital, LLC
Felix H. Tschudi,
Chairman of the Board and Owner,
Tschudi Shipping Company AS
Artem Volynets,
Chief Executive Officer, Sapinda CIS LLC
Jan-Gunnar Winther,
Director, Norwegian Polar Institute
Wang Yuhang,
Executive Vice-President and Party
Committee Member, China Ocean Shipping Group Co.
This Protocol is the result of a collaborative effort by the
members of the World Economic Forum Global Agenda
Council on the Arctic. It does not necessarily reflect the
individual opinions or ultimate commitments to be made in
all areas by the Council members, their organizations and/
or the World Economic Forum.
For further information contact Victoria Crawford at
[email protected]
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0009.png
GRU, Alm.del - 2016-17 - Bilag 22: Opsamling på Grønlandsudvalgets deltagelse i Arctic Circle Forum i Quebec
1706963_0010.png
The World Economic Forum,
committed to improving the
state of the world, is the
International Organization for
Public-Private Cooperation.
The Forum engages the
foremost political, business and
other leaders of society to shape
global, regional and industry
agendas.
World Economic Forum
91–93 route de la Capite
CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 (0) 22 869 1212
Fax: +41 (0) 22 786 2744
[email protected]
www.weforum.org